<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ► Stetzerizer Meter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lifeenergies.com/stetz-meter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lifeenergies.com</link>
	<description>Welcome to Life Energies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2012 08:54:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: P. J. Severtson</title>
		<link>http://lifeenergies.com/stetz-meter/comment-page-1/#comment-8612</link>
		<dc:creator>P. J. Severtson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2010 18:14:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lifeenergies.com/?page_id=109#comment-8612</guid>
		<description>I have just begun to look into EMF hazards and try to sort out the facts. I work in broadcast systems integration, entertainment lighting and am an active videographer.   We build broadcast installations and portable broadcast &quot;flight packs&quot; which contain a multitude of electronic equipment associated with video broadcast. 

After attending a presentation by Mid Atlantic Products, I purchased a TriField meter to measure EMF.  I find that generally, 2 to 3 milligauss is recommended as safe levels,  although there are inconsistent recommendations.  Naturally, manufacturers of laptop computers, compact florescent light bulbs, cell phones, etc., say that they are &quot;safe&quot; mainly to protect their investments. 

I would like to take this further, as it relates to our business.  Interestingly, I am also a professional home inspector and (inactive) general contractor.  
 
QUESTION:  Is there a difference between the TriField EMF meter and a  Stetzerizer Meter for any practical application?  Does the TriField meter serve or do I also need the Stetzerizer Meter? 

Thanks in advance for your kind assistance. 

P. J. Severtson
International Broadcast Consultants, Glendale, California, USA.
Severtson Enterprises.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have just begun to look into EMF hazards and try to sort out the facts. I work in broadcast systems integration, entertainment lighting and am an active videographer.   We build broadcast installations and portable broadcast &#8220;flight packs&#8221; which contain a multitude of electronic equipment associated with video broadcast. </p>
<p>After attending a presentation by Mid Atlantic Products, I purchased a TriField meter to measure EMF.  I find that generally, 2 to 3 milligauss is recommended as safe levels,  although there are inconsistent recommendations.  Naturally, manufacturers of laptop computers, compact florescent light bulbs, cell phones, etc., say that they are &#8220;safe&#8221; mainly to protect their investments. </p>
<p>I would like to take this further, as it relates to our business.  Interestingly, I am also a professional home inspector and (inactive) general contractor.  </p>
<p>QUESTION:  Is there a difference between the TriField EMF meter and a  Stetzerizer Meter for any practical application?  Does the TriField meter serve or do I also need the Stetzerizer Meter? </p>
<p>Thanks in advance for your kind assistance. </p>
<p>P. J. Severtson<br />
International Broadcast Consultants, Glendale, California, USA.<br />
Severtson Enterprises.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

